XXXI. SPEECH OF WALPOLE IN REPROOF OF MR. PITT.
Sir Robert Walpole, 1676-1745, was educated at Eton and Cam-
bridge. He entered Parliament in 1700, and soon became a good de-
bater and skillful tactician. He was prime minister of Great Britain
from 1721 to 1742, in the reigns of George I. and George II. He was an
able statesman ; but has been accused of employing corruption or brib-
ery on a large scale, to control Parliament and accomplish his purposes.
I WAS unwilling to interrupt the course of this debate,
while it was carried on with calmness and decency, by men
who do not suffer the ardor of opposition to cloud their
reason, or transport them to such expressions as the dignity
of this assembly does not admit.
I have hitherto deferred answering the gentleman, who
declaimed against the bill with such fluency and rhetoric,
and such vehemence of gesture; who charged the advocates
for the expedients now proposed, with having no regard to
any interests but their own, and with making laws only to
consume paper, and threatened them with the defection of
their adherents, and the loss of their influence, upon this
new discovery of their folly and ignorance. Nor, do I now
answer him for any other purpose than to remind him
how little the clamor of rage and petulancy of invective
contribute to the end for which this assembly is called
together ; how little the discovery of truth is promoted,
and the security of the nation established, by pompous
diction and theatrical emotion.
Formidable sounds and furious declamation, confident
assertions and lofty periods, may affect the young and in-
experienced ; and perhaps the gentleman may have con-
tracted his habits of oratory by conversing more with
those of his own age than with such as have more oppor-
tunities of acquiring knowledge, and more successful meth-
ods of communicating their sentiments. If the heat of
temper would permit him to attend to those whose age
and long acquaintance with business give them an indis-
putable right to deference and superiority, he would learn
in time to reason, rather than declaim; and to prefer just-
ness of argument and an accurate knowledge of facts, to
sounding epithets and splendid superlatives, which may dis-
turb the imagination for a moment, but leave no lasting
impression upon the mind. He would learn, that to accuse
and prove are very different; and that reproaches, unsup-
ported by evidence, affect only the character of him that
utters them.
Excursions of fancy and flights of oratory are indeed
pardonable in young men, but in no other; and it would
surely contribute more, even to the purpose for which some
gentlemen appear to speak (that of depreciating the con-
duct of the administration), to prove the inconveniences
and injustice of this bill, than barely to assert them, with
whatever magnificence of language, or appearance of zeal,
honesty, or compassion.
Please click on the image to go to the supplementary reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.